Skip to main content

Twitter in Bad Company- Don't?

I like some people I've met via Twitter quite a bit, but one whose voice really hits me is @WordsDoneWrite .

I know part of the reason is because we were both debaters. How I know is because of the way she "says" things. I get it. I can actually hear it.
Photo: ImNotQuiteJack
She took particular offense to "contest criminals" running shady contests on their blogs.

I was with her one hundred percent until she got here:
When you talk with someone online, you're implying to some degree that you think they're alright. If you take that further and retweet their blog post, share their contest, or promote their event, you're telling your network that you approve of this person. It's essentially vouching for them. The reputation you've established may sway people to participate, enroll, or otherwise support the person in question. Your reputation is at stake with every bit of information you share.
 This is PROBABLY nitpicking- we could hash this out over comments I assume, but I don't like waiting to make a point. I think the words chosen are important (and think Amber would agree).

"Talking to someone online" does not equate to "you're cool with me buddy." Or I'd take you out for a beer or whatever analog you think of when you take this stuff offline. Just because I saw something tweeted and responded to it or RT is NOT an endorsement of any kind of a blogger, website, or otherwise.

Heck, I would dare say plenty of folks have exchanges that don't indicate anything resembling a kumbayah-fest. I've only encountered one blogger that I just DROPPED. But not because of tweets, but rather how I was treated on their blog. I was engaging with that person specifically because I disagreed with them. Heck, @WordsDoneWrite and I have had our own disagreements (which seem to go her way). I don't expect everyone to agree with me, think my jokes are funny, or even get my sarcasm.

I've learned this lesson the hard way with "Who Gives a Tweet." Man, people REALLY did not like what I tweeted, but they weren't my friends or followers either (Sorry, A).

See, I am an "action's speak louder than words" kinda person. Which is ironic considering the value I place in words, but the point is speaking is such an interpretable activity whether it is written online or spoken. What you DO will prove the character much more than the words spoken. Intent and ultimately execution are so much easier to illustrate than verbalize.

Unfortunately, for online "relationships" and interchanges, we don't have enough actions to counteract poorly chosen words.

 I said this after that interchange I mentioned earlier in that link:

I said it before and I'll say it again: "I'm not right and neither are you." 
Until you "know" someone on the internet, you can't really be sure of how they might take ANYTHING you write. You could be trying to compliment and it's misinterpreted. You could just be saying you don't agree with them and they think you are a hideous, hateful troll spewing bile all over the place. 

Amber closes with:  "Your reputation is at stake with every bit of information you share."
Online, it is very easy to quickly share a link, like joke, or retweet something that others may find offense with and you not knowing it. I would certainly hope if something I've done in any category doesn't offend but I can't control it- you have the choice to see what I say and interact with it or not.

As I said, you can't be sure of how people will take things because you don't REALLY know them.

Just because I've shared something from a person or place online that you have issue with doesn't mean I give that credence. Do we need disclaimers: "Not every RT is my opinion?"

PS A wrote one of the funniest things I've read in while about the Ted Williams, Golden Voice dude:
"It's a sad state of affairs when you have to be homeless to get a job in this economy!"

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Death or Rebirth for Myspace?

  Are we really watching the slow inevitable death of Myspace? With the integration with Facebook complete and  the push towards what appears to be a mobile only function , isn't it time to call this one? One report says that Myspace is making $200 million less this year. They are functionally giving up on Myspace Music , which was always their bread and butter. Without the music tie in, why would people BOTHER with Myspace? I'm talking about it because my wife's band has used every medium known to mankind to promote themselves online and Myspace has been nothing but dead weight from the very beginning. Only bands and their most ardent fans go there. The rest are on Facebook.  There is talk of selling Myspace, but who in their right mind would consider it? This will have some interesting implications for bands down the road. Many use Myspace as their de facto website, just pushing their domain name onto the customizable site. Now apparently, Reverbnation , a North Carolin

Being a Parent

While back, I wrote a post on Father's day about being a father and how being a parent is a job. I wistfully look back as I look forward to another school year quickly approaching and the evidence of my "work" is becoming less and less my handiwork. Our youngest has just moved on to middle school. Josh has moved into high school and the oldest has graduated from high school and about "start" her life. We've had a tacit arrangement with the kids. We do NOT want boomerang kids coming back to haunt us. So they have always been told, they are staying with us until they are REALLY ready to go out and that includes the joke that college has become. Sadly, despite the fact that I have spent a good chunk of my career working in higher education, I know that it is a folly to think that sending a child off to college is preparing them for much other than to have a lifetime of loans. Thankfully, Amanda has gotten the message. She has a plan to go to local c

Check out my appearance on the The Toddcast Podcast

Click and watch the podcast recording of my appearance on the Toddcast Podcast  Such a fun time!